When downloading results on a .csv file in the Pivot view, we lose the vote results from "Brainstorm" template. Can this be brought in as a field? I know the Exec Summary report right now has them but would be great to have this feature on the Pivot too.

The option for points scoring to be the sum total based on the options a respondee chooses, so when running a report this is a total figure rather than just one of the choices they selected.

For example you have a multiple choice question with 4 possible choices, each choice is worth 25 points and respondees are able to response up to 4 times. If a respondee selects 3 options they them accrue a total of 75 pints etc.

Include in Bulk Edit option to Show/Hide results

By default all "multiple choice" questions are truely spoken single choice questions. It would be easier to add another type of questions for real multiple choice questions, where you may opt for multiple answers (e.g. like Pingo does it). Currently you have to set the number how often may a participant vote to the number of answers and then the number of how often for each answer to 1.

Allocating points to different items can be really useful. For instance, you could ask people what proportion of their taxes should go to:

Road repair
Sewers
Water
Parks
Airport expansion

When you create a multiple choice question and there are pictures to choose from, the name change.
Once you have finished the poll and want to analyze the results, there is no name of the picture the participant has chosen.

The green markers don't show up well on some of my images. Seems like this color should be a changeable feature.

Allow branching in the non-live surveys, so there can be follow-up questions posed to only those who respond in a certain way to a question. Thanks!

Allow users to disable directions while open ended questions are hiding results.

Students submit their name (and possibly major and email address as desired for data collection). Then a randomizer selects one entry as the raffle prize winner.

Divide the participants (or let them choose) in groups so they can compete against groups on the leaderboards rather than individually. Similar to the option for this in Turningpoint.

Group based competitiveness is increasingly applied within (higher) education.

Personally I wish to engage with my students playfully without compounding on the individual pressures which fuels the fear of failing, avoiding of risk and the negative aspects of performativity and goal-oriented behaviour which are typically already over-cultivated in (higher) education.

Or let us select a group of existing questions and have them copied into a competition.

In competitions, instead of each correctly answered question automatically being worth 1000 points, this value should be customizable, so questions can be worth 100, 200, 500, etc points.

Also, the option of setting incorrectly answered questions as negative points.

By default, any participant can send the same answer several times. The total count then makes no sense.

For example, to the question "What do you at night?"
one can answer several times "I play guitar."
While in most cases we need them to send each answer only once.

We need the default behaviour to allow any answer to be sent only once per participant.

It would be great if you could show the results of say 4 or more multiple choice questions by team? Having created the segmenting question, put the audience into teams and then run the multiple choice questions, it would be great if you were able to display the total results of questions on screen? I think it should be possible to get the information from a grade book so I am hoping it would not be too difficult to achieve?

The pricing structure is not good for organizations that need occasional, medium-group polling. It is such a leap between 25 participants for free and 700 participants for higher costs. It would be helpful to have an option that mimics the Engage version but with fewer participants (say 100) and a lower cost.